Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

Finance

Posted By Uma Rajagopal

Posted on November 28, 2024

Insurer Direct Line rejects Aviva’s $4.16 billion takeover bid

(Reuters) -British insurer Direct Line Insurance on Wednesday rejected a takeover offer of 3.28 billion pounds ($4.16 billion) from bigger rival Aviva, saying it “substantially undervalued” the company.

On Nov. 19, Aviva made a 250-pence-per-share offer, which represented a nearly 60% premium to the stock’s close a day earlier.

If the deal went through, Direct Line shareholders would have received 112.5 pence in cash and 0.282 new Aviva shares for every Direct Line share held.

Separately, the life, motor and home insurer Aviva, said Direct Line has refused to engage in further discussions.

The chairpersons of both companies have spoken directly to explain why Direct Line was rejecting the offer, a person with knowledge of the matter said.

Direct Line said its board considered Aviva’s proposal with its advisers and concluded that it was “highly opportunistic”.

According to British takeover rules, Aviva has until Dec. 25 to make a firm offer or walk away.

In March, London-based Direct Line also rejected a 239-pence-per-share takeover bid from Belgian rival Ageas, which was 4.6% lower than Aviva’s offer.

Shares of the UK insurer have fallen as much as 14% since Ageas abandoned its pursuit in the same month.

Direct Line — under the leadership of its new CEO Adam Winslow, who joined the company from Aviva in March — has engaged in efforts to energize a business struggling in a weak motor market.

The company missed expectations for half-year operating profit in September, hurt by its underperforming motor insurance arm.

It has implemented aggressive price hikes to mitigate the rising costs of claims and announced plans to cut 550 roles, or about 5% of its global workforce, earlier in November.

Direct Line said on Wednesday it continues to make progress towards its financial and profitability targets under its turnaround strategy.

(Reporting by Raechel Thankam Job in Bangalore; Additional reporting by Carolyn Cohn and Anousha Sakoui; Editing by Devika Syamnath, Shilpi Majumdar and Shounak Dasgupta)

Recommended for you

  • Trump US energy emergency order should withstand court challenges

  • American firms in China fearful of US-China trade turmoil at 5-yr high, survey shows

  • UK tackles infrastructure 'blockers' by cutting legal challenge options