Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

Headlines

US tariff threat limits oil prices

Posted By Global Banking and Finance Review

Posted on January 30, 2025

US tariff threat limits oil prices

By Erwin Seba

HOUSTON (Reuters) -Oil prices edged up on Thursday, held in check by threatened U.S. tariffs on Canadian and Mexican crude imports that could take effect this weekend.

Brent crude futures settled 29 cents, or 0.4%, higher at $76.87 a barrel. U.S. crude futures finished at $72.73 a barrel, up 11 cents, or 0.2% higher than Wednesday, when they settled at their lowest level this year so far.

"We're getting close to the deadline and people are getting nervous," said Phil Flynn, senior analyst with Price Futures Group.

U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to impose a 25% tariff as early as Saturday on Canadian and Mexican exports to the United States if those two countries do not end shipments of fentanyl across U.S. borders.

The White House on Tuesday reaffirmed Trump's plan to impose the tariffs, while on Wednesday, the president's nominee to run the Commerce Department said the two countries can avoid this if they act swiftly to close their borders to fentanyl.

IG market analyst Tony Sycamore, however, said traders had already priced in Trump's tariffs: "(this is) a major reason why crude oil is trading where it is."

Winter storms hit U.S. demand last week, with crude oil stockpiles in the U.S. rising by 3.5 million barrels as refiners cut production. Analysts had expected a 3.2 million-barrel build, according to a Reuters poll.

On the supply side, the latest U.S. sanctions on Moscow are squeezing crude oil exports from Russia's western ports, which are set to fall 8% in February from the January plan as Moscow boosts refining, according to traders and Reuters calculations.

Investors are also looking ahead to a meeting by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies including Russia, together called OPEC+, scheduled for Feb. 3.

The group is set to discuss Trump's efforts to raise U.S. oil production and take a joint stance on the matter, Kazakhstan said on Wednesday.

Trump has called on OPEC and its leading member, Saudi Arabia, to lower oil prices, saying doing so would end the conflict in Ukraine. He has also set up an agenda of maximizing oil and gas output in the U.S., already the world's largest producer and at record highs.

However, analysts believe a price war between the U.S. and OPEC+ is unlikely as it may hurt both.

"A price war with the U.S. would involve OPEC+ producers maximising their output to undercut prices and drive shale production into decline," analysts at BMI, a Fitch Group division, said in a note.

(Reporting by Erwin Seba in Houston, Paul Carsten, Arathy Somasekhar and Katya Golubkova. Editing by Marguerita Choy and David Evans)